🔗 Share this article

Are your professional networking connections recognizing you as a industry expert? Are hordes of respondents praising your insights on expanding your business? Are headhunters making contact to discuss opportunities?

If not, the reason might be that you're not male.

The Experiment: Modifying Gender Identity to achieve Better Visibility

Dozens of women joined an organized professional network test this week following popular discussions indicated that switching their gender to "man" boosted their network presence.

Some participants modified their profiles to include what they termed "masculine-oriented" terminology - adding action-focused professional jargon like "drive", "transform" and "accelerate". Anecdotally, their visibility also improved.

Algorithmic Bias Concerns Brought Up

The engagement increase has led some to speculate whether a built-in sexism in LinkedIn's algorithm prioritizes men who use professional networking terminology.

Similar to most major networking sites, LinkedIn utilizes a computerized system to determine which content appear to which members - promoting some while suppressing others.

Company Statement

Through a blog post, LinkedIn recognized the trend but stated it does not consider "demographic information" when deciding content distribution. Instead, the company mentioned that "hundreds of signals" affect how content are received.

Changing gender in your settings does not influence how your posts appears in search or feed.

Personal Experiences

Simone Bonnett, who modified her pronouns to "he/him" and her profile name to "a masculine version", described extraordinary results.

"The numbers I'm seeing show a sixteen-fold rise in profile views and a thirteen-fold jump in impressions," she noted.

Megan Cornish, a communications strategist, started testing after noticing her audience decline substantially.

The Process

• First, she modified her profile gender to "man"
• Subsequently, she used artificial intelligence to rewrite her profile using "male-coded" language
• Lastly, she recycled old posts with comparable "assertive" language

The outcome was immediate: a more than fourfold rise in visibility within seven days.

The Negative Aspect

Despite the positive results, Cornish voiced unhappiness with the method.

"Before, my content were more personal - concise and clever, but also friendly and human," she stated. "Now, the masculine version was assertive and self-assured - like a Caucasian man swaggering around."

She abandoned the experiment after seven days, saying "Every day I continued, and outcomes got better, I became more frustrated."

Mixed Results

Not all participants experienced positive outcomes. One writer who changed both her gender to "man" and her ethnicity to "Caucasian" reported a reduction in visibility and engagement.

"We understand there's algorithmic bias, but it's very challenging to understand how it functions in specific cases or the reasons behind it," she commented.

Broader Implications

These tests occur alongside continuing conversations about LinkedIn's distinctive position as both a business platform and social space.

Recent changes in recent months have apparently caused female creators experiencing markedly lower visibility, resulting in informal experiments where identical posts by male and female users received vastly different reach.

System Details

Per LinkedIn, the network uses AI systems to classify and spread content based on multiple factors, including post content and the user's professional identity.

The company states it regularly evaluates its algorithms, including "checks for gender-related disparities."

Company representative proposed that recent declines in some users' reach might stem from higher volume due to more content on the platform.

Changing Landscape

As one participant noted, "bro-coding" appears to be increasing on the network.

"Users typically consider LinkedIn as more businesslike and polished," she commented. "That's changing. It's becoming increasingly competitive and unpredictable."